<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Journal &#187; HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.org/tag/html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Platforms, Coding, Site Building</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/platforms-coding-site-building.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/platforms-coding-site-building.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTML and Page Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What editors have you used when just started makin&#103&#32&#102irst sites? Personally I have started with Macrome&#100&#105&#97 Dreamweaver, but very soon I made sure that it ad&#115&#32&#97 lot of bugs in HTML and started learning the lang&#117&#97&#103e itslef. Since then I’m using Allaire Homesite &#97&#110&#100 PsPad editors (Now there is Home Site 5 released &#98&#121&#32Macromedia after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What editors have you used when just started makin&#103&#32&#102irst sites? Personally I h<input type="hidden" />ave started with Macrome&#100&#105&#97 Dreamweaver, but very soon I made sure that it ad&#115&#32&#97<input id="counter" type="hidden" /> lot of bugs in HTML and started learning <span id="more-175"></span>the lang&#117&#97&#103e itslef. Since then I’m <s></s>using Allaire Homesite &#97&#110&#100 PsPad editors (Now there is Home Site 5 released &#98&#121&#32M<input id="apps" type="hidden" />acromedia after they’ve bought Allaire, but I d&#111&#110&#226t like it too). I”m tell<input id="apps" type="hidden" />ing this not just to d&#105&#115&#99uss editors we use, but to stress your attention o&#110&#32&#105mp<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ortance of clean HTML. because the more bugs you&#32&#109&#97ke in code, the more corrupte<input id="stats" type="hidden" />d it appears in serps&#32&#97&#110d title “$#ajgd^&amp;87″ or url “..php?gophp127jags7a…” don&#128&#153&#116 lo<input id="counter" type="hidden" />oks attractive, huh? However, after several yea&#114&#115&#32of practice, those webmasters,<input id="counter" type="hidden" /> who work with lots &#111&#102&#32content and have less time to edit HTML are moving&#32&#116&#111 var<input type="hidden" />ious content management systems. So do I.</p>
<p>I ha&#118&#101&#32tried a lot of them. One I was <input id="stats" type="hidden" />using up to last ye&#97&#114&#32is PhpNuke available at http://www.searchenginejou&#114&#110&#97l.org<input id="stats" type="hidden" />. It is convenient, includes a lot of useful &#116&#111&#111ls for site management. However,<input id="phpint" type="hidden" /> it contains a cou&#112&#108&#101 of bugs that are unwanted for SEO. For instance i&#116&#32&#97lways <input type="hidden" />builds ugly-looking urls and has problems wi&#116&#104&#32putting correct titles. When I ha<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ve worked on PhpN&#117&#107&#101 I spent a lot of time by tuning and adjusting it &#116&#111&#32fit my <input id="tracker" type="hidden" />needs. I found plugins that replace page ti&#116&#108&#101 with title of first article on th<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />is page, modules&#32&#116&#104at made permanent urls and so on, but it took a lo&#116&#32&#111f time t<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />o make it rolling for each new site I’ve&#32&#109&#97de and I started looking for someth<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ing more easy a&#110&#100&#32covenient. That is how blogs became platforms for &#116&#104&#101 majority<input id="apps" type="hidden" /> of my sites.</p>
<p>After trying several blog s&#99&#114&#105pts I have finally chosen two of the<input id="counter" type="hidden" />m, which, I th&#105&#110&#107 are useful for building good sites. The first one&#32&#73&#32have tried<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> is MT, which is available fromhttp://ww&#119&#46&#115earchenginejournal.org. Powerfull pla<input id="stats" type="hidden" />tform for cre&#97&#116&#105ng site. Rather easy installation and management. &#71&#111&#111d layout. T<input type="hidden" />ry it yourself to have your own opinion&#32&#111&#102 convenience.</p>
<p>My second choice, which <input id="tracker" type="hidden" />I consider t&#111&#32&#98e the best choice for today is WordPress. Uptimebo&#116&#32&#105s currently <input id="phpint" type="hidden" />working on this platform and I am comp&#108&#101&#116ely satisfied with it’s functional ab<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ilities. Of&#32&#99&#111urse it has lesser functions that MT and much less&#32&#102&#117nctions than <s></s>PhpNuke, but ease of five minutes ins&#116&#97&#108lation, attractive layout and amazingly <input id="tracker" type="hidden" />clean code&#32&#109&#97ke WordPress to be the best script for building te&#120&#116&#32sites, which I<input id="stats" type="hidden" />’d recommend for everybody, moreov&#101&#114&#32that google loves blogs and this addition<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />aly attra&#99&#116&#115 me. Besides, there is a WordPress plugin that all&#111&#119&#115 visitors to se<input id="stats" type="hidden" />e when GoogleBot came for the last &#116&#105&#109e &#8211; you can see it in footer of our page.</p>
<p>The only thing<input id="phpint" type="hidden" /> I’d l&#105&#107&#101 to be developed by WordPress is multi-site WordPr&#101&#115&#115 that would allo<input id="counter" type="hidden" />w to build several blogs using one&#32&#99&#112y of script (as it is possible with MT). Th<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ey curr&#101&#110&#116ly have only beta of multi-site script, but it is &#121&#101&#116 half-done and I <input id="counter" type="hidden" />wouldn’t recommend to use it.</p>
<p>W&#111&#114&#100press is available for download from http://<s></s>www.se&#97&#114&#99henginejournal.org.  Enjoy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/platforms-coding-site-building.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving from HTML to PHP</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/moving-from-html-to-php.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/moving-from-html-to-php.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTML and Page Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a problem that many webmasters are ought t&#111&#32&#100eal with sooner or later. Especially those, who ha&#118&#101&#32old sites, which were all based on .html files. Of&#32&#99&#111urse one can just change all .html extensions to .&#112&#104&#112 and replace the same characters in pages’ code.&#32&#72&#111wever, if you deal with SEO and your old good site&#32&#111&#99cupies good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a problem that many webmasters are ought t&#111&#32&#100eal with sooner or later. <input type="hidden" />Especially those, who ha&#118&#101&#32old sites, which were all based on .html files. Of&#32&#99&#111<input id="stats" type="hidden" />urse one can just change all .html extensions <span id="more-173"></span>to .&#112&#104&#112 and replace the same chara<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />cters in pages’ code.&#32&#72&#111wever, if you deal with SEO and your old good site&#32&#111&#99c<s></s>upies good position in SERPs, such changes can be&#32&#102&#97tal for your project for the<input type="hidden" /> following reasons:</p>
<p>1.&#32&#65&#108l indexed .html files must be indexed again with .&#112&#104&#112 e<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />xtensions.<br />
2. All links pointing particular page&#32&#119&#105ll be lost, unless you report<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> all of your link par&#116&#110&#101rs and site owners, who link to you (re-indexing o&#102&#32&#110ew <input id="stats" type="hidden" />links will take some time too).<br />
3. You will los&#101&#32&#97 lot of traffic from search en<input type="hidden" />gines during re-inde&#120&#105&#110g of the whole site will occur, even if you put an&#32&#101&#114ror <input id="stats" type="hidden" />page that will redirect surfers somewhere to y&#111&#117&#114 .php pages.<br />
4. Nobody knows wh<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ether your site wil&#108&#32&#114eturn back to good positions in SERPs after it wil&#108&#32&#100rop o<input id="counter" type="hidden" />ut.</p>
<p>So, what to do if you don’t want to cha&#110&#103&#101 file extensions for the purpose<input id="phpint" type="hidden" /> of SEO, but need &#116&#111&#32include some php code in your pages anyway? There &#97&#114&#101 sever<s></s>al methods.</p>
<p>The first, and the most obvious &#105&#115&#32to use mod_rewrite (in case if yo<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ur server support&#115&#32&#109od_rewrite and you have permissions to modify .hta&#99&#99&#101ss file<input type="hidden" />). If yes &#8211; put the following strings in your .htaccess f&#105&#108&#101:</p>
<p>RewriteEngine on<br />
RewriteRule ^(.<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />*)\.html $1\.php</p>&#10<p>&#78&#111w all requested .html pages will be automatically &#115&#117&#98stituted<input id="phpint" type="hidden" /> with .php pages.</p>
<p>Another method works wit&#104&#32&#46htaccess again. Add the following s<input id="stats" type="hidden" />tring to .htacc&#101&#115&#115 file:</p>
<p>AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php .ht&#109&#108&#32.htm</p>
<p>I th<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ink that this method is the most convenie&#110&#116&#32one, because it simply allows execut<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ing PHP script&#115&#32&#116o run in .html files. If you have no access to you&#114&#32&#46htaccess f<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ile, contact your hoster and request to &#109&#97&#107e appropriate modification of httpd.c<input type="hidden" />onf for your &#115&#105&#116e.</p>
<p>If you were using SSI on your site, for instanc&#101&#32&#108ike this:</p>
<p>T<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />han you can replace it with the followi&#110&#103&#32string in your .php files:</p>
<p>&lt; ? include(&#8216;file.txt&#8217;); ?&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/moving-from-html-to-php.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

