<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Journal &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.org/category/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google updates SEO guidance</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-updates-seo-guidance.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-updates-seo-guidance.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google updates SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[published a guide SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO guidance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=1225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November 2008 the search engine in Mountain View had publ&#105&#115&#104ed a guide SEO which contained valuable suggestion&#115&#32&#116o better exploit the content of your site. Well ye&#115&#116&#101rday was an updated version of the guide and the n&#101&#119&#115 was spread by its Google on its official blog . What&#8217;s new in this update&#32&#109&#97inly concern the addition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In November 2008 the search engine in Mountain View had publ&#105&#115&#104ed a guide SEO which conta<input id="apps" type="hidden" />ined valuable suggestion&#115&#32&#116o better exploit the content of your site. Well ye&#115&#116&#101<input id="stats" type="hidden" />rday was an updated version of the guide and the n&#101&#119&#115 was spread by its Google o<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />n its official blog .</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What&#8217;s new in this update&#32&#109&#97inly concern the addition of techniques for optimi&#122&#97&#116i<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />on of mobile devices and a clearer wording for re&#97&#100&#97bility. E &#8216;was added a glossary of terms a<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />nd definitions and als&#111&#32&#118ery precious images that help to better understand&#32&#97&#108l <input id="stats" type="hidden" />the particulars of the guide . <span id="more-1225"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Furthermore, the document &#119&#97&#115 made available with the tran<input id="stats" type="hidden" />slation of 40 languag&#101&#115&#46 It is also interesting to finally see what he loo&#107&#115&#32Goo<input id="apps" type="hidden" />glebot , as you can see in the pictures.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Google SEO Guide&#32</strong><br />&#10&#73n short, is a guide to read an<input id="stats" type="hidden" />d keep on hand in or&#100&#101&#114 to better optimize their site and the content pub&#108&#105&#115hed.<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> Follow these instructions is not difficult, b&#117&#116&#32certainly requires some patienc<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />e and method, beari&#110&#103&#32in mind that, just follow the signs to say that I &#104&#97&#118e to <input id="stats" type="hidden" />start from the site contents clean and well-o&#114&#103&#97nized. Yes, because you are talk<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ing about this ver&#121&#32&#108ong and there are many schools of thought that hav&#101&#32&#100evelop<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ed, many of them containing hot air. Then be&#103&#97&#110 to do if you want to seriously t<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />alk about content&#32&#113&#117ality is much to follow these instructions, the re&#115&#116&#32is up t<input type="hidden" />o you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-updates-seo-guidance.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Google Instant Site Preview &#8211; a danger?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-and-google-instant-site-preview-a-danger.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-and-google-instant-site-preview-a-danger.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrete design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Instant Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Instant Site Preview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=1192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned this afternoon, twittered, I had had in the U&#75&#32&#98log  a very interesting article by Patrick Altoft&#32&#102&#111und, in which he reported on a new feature that Go&#111&#103&#108e will be tested with currently. The idea is that &#71&#111&#111gle is currently working on a solution that presen&#116&#115&#32users already found a preview of the sites in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">As I mentioned this afternoon, twittered, I had had in the U&#75&#32&#98log  a very interesting a<input id="stats" type="hidden" />rticle by Patrick Altoft&#32&#102&#111und, in which he reported on a new feature that Go&#111&#103&#108<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />e will be tested with currently. The idea is that &#71&#111&#111gle is currently working on<input id="phpint" type="hidden" /> a solution that presen&#116&#115&#32users already found a preview of the sites in the &#83&#69&#82P<s></s>s as a preview version as soon as you touch it wi&#116&#104&#32the mouse. This is already t<input id="stats" type="hidden" />he second great innova&#116&#105&#111n from Google in a short time, finally, was presen&#116&#101&#100 r<input id="apps" type="hidden" />ecently with Google Instant real-time search in &#116&#104&#101 search results when you ente<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />r each new letter wil&#108&#32&#98e updated in real time. Sounds revolutionary!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here, the new &#102&#101&#97tur<input id="counter" type="hidden" />es of Google are actually not soon new as they &#109&#97&#121 seem at first. The search eng<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ine had Yahoo! sever&#97&#108&#32years ago a similar feature for real-time search w&#105&#116&#104 the<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> name Yahoo! Instant Search, which acceptance &#119&#97&#115<span id="more-1192"></span> set back due to lack of (seo.a<input id="stats" type="hidden" />t reported ), and i&#110&#32&#74anuary 2009, the search engine MelZoo already have&#32&#97&#32previ<s></s>ew of websites disposal. Old hats, then?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Apart from the&#32&#102&#97ct that the ideas are not new &#8230; this way that <input id="tracker" type="hidden" />Google is of cours&#101&#32&#97 much longer range so these two search engines tog&#101&#116&#104er and<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> has the Internet affinity has significantly&#32&#105&#110creased among users in recent yea<input id="apps" type="hidden" />rs, raises the qu&#101&#115&#116ion: How are the two latest features of Google in &#116&#104&#101 search<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> behavior and usage patterns of users and c&#111&#110&#115equently also on the online market<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ing industry?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Of course, t&#104&#101&#115e questions can not yet be fully determined as it &#103&#101&#116s here o<input id="counter" type="hidden" />n the long-term acceptance of users. If th&#101&#115&#101 features in the coming weeks and m<input id="stats" type="hidden" />onths to feel u&#115&#101&#102ul, it will come in the Internet marketing industr&#121&#32&#102or one or<s></s> another change in strategy (have to). Bu&#116&#32&#105t is clear now that the new features<input id="apps" type="hidden" />, many website&#32&#111&#119ners, especially those behind the first 5 position&#115&#32&#97re clearly<input id="apps" type="hidden" /> cost of traffic will be. On the one han&#100&#44&#32by the instant search and the other b<input id="apps" type="hidden" />y the preview&#32&#102&#117nction, for he who has found in the first two or t&#104&#114&#101e goals alr<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />eady this supposedly matching result, w&#105&#108&#108 no longer fight the other places 5-10<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> or even the&#32&#110&#101xt few pages.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">During the current user without preview functi&#111&#110&#32to find clic<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ks several results to see whether it m&#105&#103&#104t act to the page containing the desire<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />d informati&#111&#110&#44 he can click many of the results then no longer, &#115&#111&#32the traffic w<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ill inevitably fall on many pages exp&#101&#99&#116ed. My concern is even then, that sites <s></s>with unsig&#104&#116&#108y and discrete design particularly strong among th&#101&#109&#32unfortunately,<input id="apps" type="hidden" /> because often the first impression &#99&#111&#117nts, without the motto &#8220;An ugly site can not have any r<input id="apps" type="hidden" />elevant c&#111&#110&#116ent.&#8221; &#8211; But this is a mistake often. What may be so for the average user could&#32&#98&#101 useful and cou<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ld be developed for online marketer&#115&#32&#105n the future provide a slight headache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-and-google-instant-site-preview-a-danger.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google search engine optimized site-specific results</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-search-engine-optimized-site-specific-results.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-search-engine-optimized-site-specific-results.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet giant Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=1171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. internet search engine giant Google has adapted its&#32&#111&#119n location-based results and expanded. As the comp&#97&#110&#121 announced on Monday in his blog, it was important&#32&#116&#111 provide the users find the main results. &#8220;Places are therefore &#106&#117&#115t as much as Internet sites,&#8221; said a Google manager. The user typed in the&#32&#115&#101arch window such as &#8220;restaurant&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The U.S. internet search engine giant Google has adapted its&#32&#111&#119n location-based results a<input id="apps" type="hidden" />nd expanded. As the comp&#97&#110&#121 announced on Monday in his blog, it was important&#32&#116&#111<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> provide the users find the main results. &#8220;Places are therefore &#106&#117&#115t as much as Internet sites<input id="counter" type="hidden" />,&#8221; said a Google manager.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The user typed in the&#32&#115&#101arch window such as &#8220;restaurant&#8221; which he is now in the results under the head&#105&#110&#103 <input id="phpint" type="hidden" />places all restaurants displayed in its vicinity.&#32&#71&#111ogle places them function as<s></s> usual in the navigati&#111&#110&#32pane on the left side so that the user does not ha&#118&#101&#32to<input id="counter" type="hidden" /> get used. In the settings you can change the pl&#97&#99&#101 and even &#8220;look at the future destination f<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />or hotels, bars or ot&#104&#101&#114 <span id="more-1171"></span>venues,&#8221; thus according to the spokesman. The new feature will &#98&#101&#32ava<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ilable in over 40 languages and no change to th&#101&#32&#115ettings of privacy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The U.S. Internet gi<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ant Google is invest&#105&#110&#103 in a large offshore wind farm off the east coast &#111&#102&#32the <s></s>United States. The California company said in &#104&#105&#115 Internet blog that 37.5 percen<input id="apps" type="hidden" />t of capital to the&#32&#100&#101velopment stage of the project will be accepted. A&#32&#102&#117rther<input id="phpint" type="hidden" /> 37.5 percent are from the New York firm Good&#32&#69&#110ergy. The entire project named &#8220;Atlantic Wind <input type="hidden" />Connection&#8221; (AWC) is estimated t&#111&#32&#99ost five billion U.S. dollars. The wind farm cover&#115&#32&#110early <input id="counter" type="hidden" />560 kilometers off the coast of New Jersey t&#111&#32&#86irginia, and when completed will <input id="apps" type="hidden" />provide electrici&#116&#121&#32for nearly two million households. Google hopes th&#97&#116&#32claims <input id="counter" type="hidden" />to &#8220;a solid return&#8221; of the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-search-engine-optimized-site-specific-results.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Ranking Factors Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-ranking-factors-overview.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-ranking-factors-overview.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ranking Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Ranking Factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ranking Factors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article &#8216; Universal Google Ranking Factors &#8216;on searchenginejournal.org was recently &#116&#114&#105ed, all in relation to the universal search rankin&#103&#32&#102actors important individual contents (pictures, vi&#100&#101&#111s, etc.) list. The article referred to therein or &#115&#111&#117rces provide a really good idea of what to conside&#114&#32&#119hen optimizing a specific content. The individual &#102&#97&#99tors include: Ranking factors for normal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The article &#8216; Universal Google Ranking Factors &#8216;on searchenginejournal.org was recently &#116&#114&#105ed, all in relation to the<input id="apps" type="hidden" /> universal search rankin&#103&#32&#102actors important individual contents (pictures, vi&#100&#101&#111<input id="apps" type="hidden" />s, etc.) list. The article referred to therein or &#115&#111&#117rces provide a really good <input id="counter" type="hidden" />idea of what to conside&#114&#32&#119hen optimizing a specific content. The individual &#102&#97&#99t<s></s>ors include: <span id="more-1162"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factors for normal results </strong><br />
- Keyword&#32&#97&#115 the link text<br />
- Link popula<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />rity<br />
- Domain Populari&#116&#121<br />&#10- Keywords in Title<br />
- Trust a domain <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factors for lo&#99&#97&#108 r<input id="counter" type="hidden" />esults </strong><br />
- Right (claim) of an entry<br />
- Local refe&#114&#101&#110ce of the address<br />
- Relevance<s></s> of the categories<br />
- &#75&#101&#121words in Title<br />
- Keywords in Description <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factors fo&#114&#32&#105mag<s></s>es </strong><br />
- Uniqueness of the image<br />
- Description (Al&#116&#45&#84ext/Umgebung)<br />
- External link <input id="counter" type="hidden" />an image<br />
- Internal &#76&#105&#110king an image<br />
- Image size / quality <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factors for vi&#100&#101&#111s </strong><br />
-<input type="hidden" /> Keywords in Title<br />
- Relevance of the Day<br />
- Li&#110&#107&#32to You Tube<br />
- Keywords in Descr<s></s>iption<br />
- Notes / Co&#109&#109&#101nts <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factors for products </strong><br />
- Keywords in Title / Des&#99&#114&#105ption<br /><input id="apps" type="hidden" />
- Amount of price<br />
- Scope of the product inf&#111&#114&#109ation<br />
- Timeliness of product in<input id="counter" type="hidden" />formation<br />
Reviews &#8211; <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factors for b&#108&#111&#103s </strong><br />
- Keyword in Title / Description<br />
- Related Blog&#32&#80&#111st<br />
- L<input type="hidden" />inks to the blog<br />
- Trust blog of a (subscrib&#101&#114&#115 etc.)<br />
- Number of keywords in th<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />e text <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factors in &#78&#101&#119s </strong><br />
- Number / quality of a news source<br />
- News Arti&#99&#108&#101<br />
- Uniq<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ueness / links to the article<br />
- Quality / l&#101&#110&#103th of the article<br />
- Besucher-/Klic<input id="stats" type="hidden" />kverhalten <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ranking factor&#115&#32&#102or Tweets </strong><br />
- Keyword in the text / Hash tag<br />
- Numb&#101&#114&#32Tweets K<s></s>eyword<br />
- News of Tweets<br />
- Number Rewets<br />
- &#84&#114&#117st (Follower, etc.) of the account</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/google-ranking-factors-overview.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips to improve your searches on Google</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/tips-to-improve-your-searches-on-google.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/tips-to-improve-your-searches-on-google.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make a difference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searches on Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips to improve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of the best collections of tricks for Google sea&#114&#99&#104es I&#8217;ve seen lately is that since we have to use Google every da&#121&#32&#108ike it or not for various reasons it will help us &#108&#101&#97rn those little tricks that will undoubtedly make &#97&#32&#100ifference . Users tend to type your query and if the result [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">This is one of the best collections of tricks for Google sea&#114&#99&#104es I&#8217;ve seen lately is that since we hav<input type="hidden" />e to use Google every da&#121&#32&#108ike it or not for various reasons it will help us &#108&#101&#97<input id="stats" type="hidden" />rn those little tricks that will undoubtedly make &#97&#32&#100ifference .</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Users tend to type your q<input id="stats" type="hidden" />uery and if the result &#105&#115&#32not satisfactory start to turn pages of results un&#116&#105&#108 <input id="apps" type="hidden" />you reach the desired result, but there are many &#108&#105&#116tle tricks that help us make<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> our queries much more&#32&#101&#102ficient.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some of these tricks are very obvious but others ar&#101&#32&#117nk<input id="counter" type="hidden" />nown but a large majority read these tips and wa&#116&#99&#104es your next search will be m<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ore efficient:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Often we find re&#115&#117&#108ts different words but are not related, to do so f&#111&#114&#32exa<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />mple if we find basketball-related things we [b&#97&#115&#107etball basket] This is not qui<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />te right we should l&#101&#97&#114n to use the symbol in this way the form means tha&#116&#32&#119e ha<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ve a query with two different keywords.<span id="more-1140"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The problem we h&#97&#118&#101 is very similar to the previou<input id="apps" type="hidden" />s one, when looking&#32&#102&#111r exact matches we forget the use of quotation mar&#107&#115&#32(&#8220;&#8221;) as we type for example as th<s></s>is query returns all the results we are conce&#114&#110&#101d with the first and the second <input type="hidden" />word regardless of&#32&#109&#97tch so remember that if you type a query in quotat&#105&#111&#110 marks<input id="apps" type="hidden" />, you&#8217;ll only get results that exactly match the terms ent&#101&#114&#101d in the order is identical to th<input id="apps" type="hidden" />e phrase used as &#97&#32&#107eyword.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Many times there are certain queries that do not wis&#104&#32&#116o appea<input id="stats" type="hidden" />r results for any particular word we can us&#101&#32&#116he symbol &#8220;-&#8221; thus remove the / s word / s unwanted this query<input type="hidden" /> returns results&#32&#119&#101 football, basketball, but none related to tennis.</p>&#10<p style="text-align: justify;">Not worth&#32&#116&#104e use of<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> the symbol &#8220;~&#8221; but in this case it works in Castilian rather disappoi&#110&#116&#105ng since it will use an example in <s></s>English, as you&#32&#99&#97n see we use the clause to remove words &#8220;-&#8221; and this new &#8220;~&#8221; The result therefore must be something to do &#119&#105&#116h dumb (s<input id="apps" type="hidden" />tupid) but not containing that word &#8230; the result gives &#117&#115&#32Google is &#8220;funny little man&#8221; or &#8220;stupid little man&#8221; very valid.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The symbol &#8220;*&#8221; is commonly used to represent anything and in this <input id="stats" type="hidden" />case there wil&#108&#32&#98e less. If such are looking lyrics for a song and &#119&#101&#32do not agr<input id="counter" type="hidden" />ee very well of her might use this trick&#194&#160&#32returns those who begin can’t Songs<input type="hidden" /> &amp; &#8220;foo&#8221; + me love &#8230; in this case returns the result of the Beatles son&#103&#32&#8220;Can not Buy&#32&#77&#101 Love.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A common use of the asterisk is filling in the gaps correspond to &#97&#32&#113uestion: . <s></s>You can also use more of a wildcard, su&#99&#104&#32as .</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If you need help using these operators can <input id="counter" type="hidden" />always use t&#104&#101&#32advanced search.<br />
Search Faces</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Recently Google has begun offe&#114&#105&#110g a type of <input id="apps" type="hidden" />image searches to only include faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/tips-to-improve-your-searches-on-google.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Basics About Google</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/760.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/760.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crawling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoogleBot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searching the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you sit down at your computer and do a Google&#32&#115&#101arch, you&#8217;re almost instantly presented with a list of results f&#114&#111&#109 all over the web. How does Google find web pages &#109&#97&#116ching your query, and determine the order of searc&#104&#32&#114esults? In the simplest terms, you could think of &#115&#101&#97rching the web as looking in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you sit down at your computer and do a Google&#32&#115&#101arch, you&#8217;re almost instantly presented <s></s>with a list of results f&#114&#111&#109 all over the web. How does Google find web pages &#109&#97&#116<input id="apps" type="hidden" />ching your query, and determine the order of searc&#104&#32&#114esults?</p>
<p>In the simplest ter<input id="counter" type="hidden" />ms, you could think of &#115&#101&#97rching the web as looking in a very large book wit&#104&#32&#97n<s></s> impressive index telling you exactly where every&#116&#104&#105ng is located. When you perf<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />orm a Google search, o&#117&#114&#32programs check our index to determine the most rel&#101&#118&#97nt<input id="apps" type="hidden" /> search results to be returned ( &#8220;served&#8221;) to you.</p>
<p>Crawling:<br />
Crawling is the&#32&#112&#114ocess by which Googlebot disc<input type="hidden" />overs new and updated&#32&#112&#97ges to be added to the Google index.<br />
We use a huge&#32&#115&#101t o<input type="hidden" />f computers to fetch (or &#8220;crawl&#8221;) billions of pages on the web. The program&#32&#116&#104at does the fetching is called<input id="counter" type="hidden" /> Googlebot (also kno&#119&#110&#32as a robot, bot, or spider). Googlebot uses an Alg&#111&#114&#105thmi<input id="stats" type="hidden" />c process: computer programs determine which s&#105&#116&#101s to crawl, how often, and how <input id="apps" type="hidden" />many pages to fetch&#32&#102&#114om each site.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s crawl process begins with a list of web p&#97&#103&#101 URLs<input id="counter" type="hidden" />, generated from previous crawl processes, an&#100&#32&#97ugmented with Sitemap data provi<input id="apps" type="hidden" />ded by webmasters.&#32&#65&#115 Googlebot visits of each these websites it detect&#115&#32&#108inks o<input id="counter" type="hidden" />n each page and adds them to its list of pag&#101&#115&#32to crawl. New sites, changes to e<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />xisting sites, an&#100&#32&#100ead links are noted and used to update the Google &#105&#110&#100ex.</p>
<p>Goo<input id="stats" type="hidden" />gle does not accept payment to crawl a site&#32&#109&#111re frequently, and we keep the sea<input id="counter" type="hidden" />rch side of our &#98&#117&#115iness separate from our revenue-generating AdWords&#32&#115&#101rvice.</p>
<p>I<input type="hidden" />ndexing:<br />
Googlebot processes each of the p&#97&#103&#101s it crawls in order to compile a m<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />assive index of&#32&#97&#108l the words it sees and their location on each pag&#101&#46&#32In additi<input id="apps" type="hidden" />on, we process information included in ke&#121&#32&#99ontent tags and attributes, such as <input id="counter" type="hidden" />Title tags and&#32&#65&#76T attributes. Googlebot can process many, but not &#97&#108&#108, content <input id="apps" type="hidden" />types. For example, we can not process t&#104&#101&#32content of some rich media files or d<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ynamic pages.</p>&#10<p>&#83&#101rving results:<br />
When a user enters a query, our mac&#104&#105&#110es search t<input type="hidden" />he index for matching pages and return &#116&#104&#101 results we believe are the most relev<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ant to the u&#115&#101&#114. Relevancy is determined by over 200 factors, one&#32&#111&#102 which is th<input id="stats" type="hidden" />e PageRank for a given page. PageRank &#105&#115&#32the measure of the importance of a page<input id="phpint" type="hidden" /> based on t&#104&#101&#32incoming links from other pages. In simple terms, &#101&#97&#99h link to a p<input id="stats" type="hidden" />age on your site from another site ad&#100&#115&#32to your site&#8217;s PageRank. Not all links are equal: Goog<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />le works h&#97&#114&#100 to improve the user experience by identifying spa&#109&#32&#108inks and other<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> practices that negatively impact se&#97&#114&#99h results. The best types of links are th<s></s>ose that &#97&#114&#101 given based on the quality of your content.</p>
<p>In or&#100&#101&#114 for your site <input id="apps" type="hidden" />to rank well in search results page&#115&#44&#32it&#8217;s important to make sure that Google can crawl and in<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />dex your&#32&#115&#105te correctly. Our Webmaster Guidelines outline som&#101&#32&#98est practices th<input id="counter" type="hidden" />at can help you avoid common pitfa&#108&#108&#115 and improve your site&#8217;s ranking.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s Related Searches, Spelling S<s></s>uggesti&#111&#110&#115, and Google Suggest features are designed to help&#32&#117&#115ers save time by <input id="apps" type="hidden" />displaying related terms, common &#109&#105&#115spellings, and people&#8217;s queries. Like our google.com searc<s></s>h resu&#108&#116&#115, the keywords used by these features are automati&#99&#97&#108ly generated by ou<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />r web crawlers and search algori&#116&#104&#109s. We only display these suggestions when we <input id="phpint" type="hidden" />think&#32&#116&#104ey might save the user time. If a site ranks well &#102&#111&#114 a keyword, it&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve algorithmically <s></s>determined that its content is &#109&#111&#114e relevant to the user&#8217;s query.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/760.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain or subdomain? Sandbox question.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/domain-or-subdomain-sandbox-question.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/domain-or-subdomain-sandbox-question.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandbox question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I have received an e-mail with the follwi&#110&#103&#32question: Is the whole domain, or just a page gets&#32&#115&#97ndboxed? Due to my research in this field whole do&#109&#97&#105n and subdomains are sanboxed too, unless this is &#97&#32&#226hilltop” domain, when single subdomain can get&#32&#115&#97ndboxed, while other subdomains, domain, and domai&#110&#226&#128s children pages experience no affection of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I have received an e-mail with the follwi&#110&#103&#32question:</p>
<p>Is the whole dom<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ain, or just a page gets&#32&#115&#97ndboxed?</p>
<p>Due to my research in this field whole do&#109&#97&#105<input type="hidden" />n and subdomains are <span id="more-295"></span>sanboxed too, unless this is &#97&#32&#226hilltop” domain, when s<input id="counter" type="hidden" />ingle subdomain can get&#32&#115&#97ndboxed, while other subdomains, domain, and domai&#110&#226&#128<input id="stats" type="hidden" />s children pages experience no affection of this &#102&#105&#108ter.</p>
<p>Please, give your opini<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ons concerning sandbox&#46&#32&#73 think that it is affecting pages, which gain a lo&#116&#32&#111f <input id="tracker" type="hidden" />backlinks in short period of time, but some of m&#121&#32&#102riends have different opinion<input id="stats" type="hidden" />s concerning this que&#115&#116&#105on. Well, what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/domain-or-subdomain-sandbox-question.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publishing Borrowed Content</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/publishing-borrowed-content.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/publishing-borrowed-content.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing Borrowed Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you need to put somebody’s content on &#121&#111&#117r site. This may be some unchangeable documents, F&#65&#81&#115, excerpts from articles, pdf documents, etc. Howe&#118&#101&#114, you risk to get penalized for duplicate content.&#32&#73&#32have got such problem and this how I guess it can &#98&#101&#32solved: I have a couple of downloadable archives w&#105&#116&#104 software of side publisher, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you need to put somebody’s content on &#121&#111&#117r site. This may be some u<s></s>nchangeable documents, F&#65&#81&#115, excerpts from articles, pdf documents, etc. Howe&#118&#101&#114<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />, you risk to get penalized for duplicate content.&#32&#73&#32have got such problem and t<s></s>his how I guess it can &#98&#101&#32solved:</p>
<p><span id="more-292"></span>I have a couple of downloadable archives w&#105&#116&#104 <input id="tracker" type="hidden" />software of side publisher, but I had to put supp&#111&#114&#116 documentation of this side <s></s>publisher on download &#97&#110&#100 support pages. Of course it is nonsense to rewrit&#101&#32&#108on<input id="counter" type="hidden" />g documents, which sometimes contain over 100 pa&#103&#101&#115. I wrote short preview passa<input id="counter" type="hidden" />ges for each document&#32&#119&#105th a link to the original document. Then I forbid &#105&#110&#100exi<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ng of full documents. That’s how it works on &#109&#121&#32site over a year and I have no<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> problems with dupli&#99&#97&#116e content penalty.</p>
<p>Sincerely</p>
<p>yours</p>
<p>Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/publishing-borrowed-content.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indexing How-to.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/indexing-how-to.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/indexing-how-to.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoogleBot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally, a small site with proper structure, corr&#101&#99&#116 linking, clean code and a couple of good backlink&#115&#32&#103ets indexed in very short time and you start findi&#110&#103&#32it in SERPs. But what about large sites and doorwa&#121&#115&#63 Some webmasters are building sites with over 100k&#32&#112&#97ges with several levels of linking. If you have tr&#111&#117&#98les with indexing of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally, a small site with proper structure, corr&#101&#99&#116 linking, clean code and a<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> couple of good backlink&#115&#32&#103ets indexed in very short time and you start findi&#110&#103&#32<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />it in SERPs. But what about large sites and doorwa&#121&#115&#63</p>
<p><span id="more-289"></span>Some webmasters are buildi<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ng sites with over 100k&#32&#112&#97ges with several levels of linking. If you have tr&#111&#117&#98l<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />es with indexing of such sites, then use these ti&#112&#115&#32to get your huge site indexe<input type="hidden" />d quicker:</p>
<p>- You need &#115&#111&#109e links to force GoogleBot read your site, so buy,&#32&#111&#114 e<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />xchange links.<br />
- Don’t point all links to the &#105&#110&#100ex page of your site, but put<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> several of them to t&#104&#101&#32index page and put at least one link per each subc&#97&#116&#101gor<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />y. This means that if, for instance, you have f&#111&#117&#114 levels of linking &#8211; each category of each l<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />evel must have an in&#98&#111&#117nd link.<br />
- If you haven’t got enough links to fe&#101&#100&#32all <input id="counter" type="hidden" />your subcategories, put them to second level o&#110&#108&#121 and when it will get properly <input id="apps" type="hidden" />indexed, change lin&#107&#115&#32to feed thrid level. However, this way is not reco&#109&#109&#101nded.<br /><input id="apps" type="hidden" />
- In case if your site stays unindexed, refe&#114&#32&#116o some site analyzing software t<input id="counter" type="hidden" />hat will spot brok&#101&#110&#32links, inaccessible areas of your site and other m&#105&#115&#116akes r<input id="counter" type="hidden" />elated to linking.<br />
- Check your .htaccess an&#100&#32&#114obots.txt files for consistency w<input id="counter" type="hidden" />ith current proje&#99&#116&#46</p>
<p>It is also possible to create site’s categories&#32&#97&#110d subca<input id="apps" type="hidden" />tegories on subdomains of general domain an&#100&#32&#108ink there. It’s up to you what s<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />trategy to choos&#101&#44&#32but remember &#8211; there’s nothing impossible in SEO, so even very&#32&#104&#117ge site <input id="phpint" type="hidden" />can be forced to be indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/indexing-how-to.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picture Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/picture-optimization.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/picture-optimization.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picture Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have noticed that pictures that have proper titl&#101&#115&#32and links are giving about 15% of all target traff&#105&#99&#32that comes to one of my site. Did anybody tried to&#32&#100&#111 the same? I mean get target traffic by optimizing&#32&#112&#105ctures? Usually I give a name that corresponds to &#103&#101&#110eral site title and specific item of pic. For inst&#97&#110&#99e [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed that pictures that have proper titl&#101&#115&#32and links are giving about<s></s> 15% of all target traff&#105&#99&#32that comes to one of my site. Did anybody tried to&#32&#100&#111<input id="apps" type="hidden" /> the same? I mean get target traffic by optimizing&#32&#112&#105ctures?</p>
<p><span id="more-286"></span>Usually I give a na<s></s>me that corresponds to &#103&#101&#110eral site title and specific item of pic. For inst&#97&#110&#99e<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> in the site is about cars and there is a Lamborg&#104&#105&#110i Diablo on a picture, I’d<input type="hidden" /> call it lamborghini_d&#105&#97&#98lo_cars.jpg, or cars_lamborghini_diablo.jpg &#8211; depending on which&#32&#107&#101yw<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ord it must be stressed.</p>
<p>What do you think about&#32&#111&#112timization of pictures? Do yo<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />u use pictures optimi&#122&#97&#116ion on your sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginejournal.org/picture-optimization.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

